Why Tech Companies Need Simpler Terms of Servic… 8 Best WordPress Hosting Solutions on the Market Business logic specific reconciliation: This is a popular use case for Dynamo. Each data object is replicated across multiple nodes. The shopping cart service is a prime example of this category.Timestamp based reconciliation: This case differs from the previous one only in the reconciliation mechanism. The service that maintains customers’ session information is a good example of a service that uses this mode.High performance read engine: While Dynamo is built to be an “always writeable” data store, a few services are tuning its quorum characteristics and using it as a high performance read engine. Services that maintain a product catalog and promotional items fit in this category.Dynamo shows once again how disciplined and rare Amazon is at using and re-using its infrastructure. The technical managementmust have realized early on that the very survival of the business depended on common, bullet proof, flexible, and scalable software systems.Amazon succeeded in both implementing and spreading the infrastructure through the company. It truly earned the mandate to thenleverage its internal pieces and offer them as web services.How Does Dynamo Fit With AWS?The short answer is that it does not, because it is not a public service. The short answer is also shortsighted becausethere are clear implications. First, is that since Amazon is committed to building a stack of web services, a version of Dynamois likely to be available to the public at some time in the future.Second, Amazon is restless in its innovation; and that applies to web services as well as it applies to its retail business. S3 has already made possible a whole new generationof startups and web services and Dynamo is likely to do the same when it comes out. And we know that more is likely to come, as even withDynamo, the stack of web services is far from complete.Finally, Amazon is showing openness – a highly valuable characteristic. Surely, Google and Microsofthave similar systems, but Amazon is putting them out in the open and turning its infrastructure into a business fasterthan its competitors. It is this openness that will allow Amazon to build trust and community around their Web Services stack. It is a powerful force, which is likely to win over developers and business people as well.The Future – Amazon Web OSTo any computer scientist or software engineer to watch what Amazon is doing is both awesome and humbling.Taking complex theoretical concepts and algorithms, adopting them to business environments (down to the SLA!), provingthat they work at the world’s largest retail site, and then turning around and making them available to the rest of the worldis nothing short of a tour-de-force. What Emre Sokullu called HaaS (Hardware as a Service) in his postyesterday is not only an innovative business strategy, but also a triumph of software engineering.Amazon is on track to roll out more virtual web services, which will collectively amount to a web operating system.The building blocks that are already in place and the ones to come are going to be remixed to create new web applicationsthat were simply not possible before. As we have written here recently, it is the libraries that make it possible to create giant systemswith just a handful of engineers. Amazon’s Web Services are going to make web-scale computing available to anyone. This isunimaginably powerful. This future is almost here, so we can begin thinking about it today. What kinds of things do you want to buildwith existing and coming Amazon Web Services? A Web Developer’s New Best Friend is the AI Wai… Related Posts In the figure above we show a concept schematic for how a distributed storage system works.The information is distributed around a ring of computers, each computer is identical. To ensure fault tolerance, in casea particular node breaks down, the data is made redundant, so each object is stored in the system multiple times.In technical terms, Dynamo is called an eventually consistent storage system. The terminologymay seem a bit odd, but as it turns out creating a distributed storage solution which is both responsiveand consistent is a difficult problem. As you can tell from the diagram above, if one computer updates object A,these changes need to propagate to other machines. This is done using asynchronous communication, which is whythe system is called “eventually consistent.”How Dynamo WorksThe technical details in Vogels’ paper are quite complex, but the way in which Dynamo works can be understood more simply.First, like Amazon S3, Dynamo offers a simple put and get interface. Each putrequires the key, context and the object. The context is based on the object and is used by Dynamofor validating updates. Here is the high level description of Dynamo and a put request: Physical nodes are thought of as identical and organized into a ring.Virtual nodes are created by the system and mapped onto physical nodes, so that hardwarecan be swapped for maintenance and failure.The partitioning algorithm is one of the most complicated pieces of the system, it specifies which nodes will storea given object.The partitioning mechanism automatically scales as nodes enter and leave the system.Every object is asynchronously replicated to N nodes.The updates to the system occur asynchronously and may result in multiple copies of the object in the system with slightlydifferent states.The discrepancies in the system are reconciled after a period of time, ensuring eventual consistency.Any node in the system can be issued a put or get request for any key.So Dynamo is quite complex, but is also conceptually simple. It is inspired by the way things work in nature – based onself-organization and emergence. Each node is identical to other nodes, the nodes can come in and out of existence, and the data is automaticallybalanced around the ring – all of this makes Dynamo similar to an ant colony or beehive.Finally, Dynamo’s internals are implemented in Java. The choice is likely because, as we’ve written here,Java is an elegant programming language, which allows the appropriate level of object-orineted modeling. And yes, once again, it is fast enough!Dynamo – The SLA In A BoxPerhaps the most stunning revelation about Dynamo is that it can be tuned using just a handful parameters to achievedifferent, technical goals that in turn support different business requirements. Dynamo is a storage service in the box driven by an SLA.Different applications at Amazon use different configurations of Dynamo depending on their tolerence to delays or data discrepancy.The paper lists these main uses of Dynamo: Dr. Vogels has been both the architect and the evangelist of this effort. In his speech at last year’s ETech conferencehe explained that by leveraging the Amazon Web Services Stack, web developers are finally able to focus on the core business logic of their apps and services.Hiding the enormous complexity of building a scalable web business behind a simple API, Amazon is paving the way toward a wholenew web ballgame.What Vogels talked about on his blog a few weeks back is not a public web service, but a piece of internal infrastructure,which allows Amazon to service millions of customers. The paper is a unique revelation about the inner workings ofone of just a handful of Internet giants. It is also a preview of the web services to come in the next decade. In this postwe take a close look at Dynamo, discuss where it fits and consider its implications.Scalability Issues With Relational DatabasesBefore discussing Dynamo it is worth taking look back to understand its origins. One of the most powerfuland useful technologies that has been powering the web since its early days is the relational database.Particularly, relational databases have been used a lot for retail sites where visitors are able to browse and search for products.Modern relational database are able to handle millions of products and service very large sites. Yet, even from a casual glance, it is clear that Amazon’s work is very important. Since early last year,the e-commerce giant has been making forays into becoming a Web OS company. Amazon has been methodically exposing pieces of its own infrastructure as commodity webservices, and in the process confusing Wall Street analysts andmaking thousands of startups quite happy. alex iskold 1 So as a relational database grows, it becomes a bottle neck and the point of failure for the entire system.As mega e-commerce sites grew over the past decade they became aware of this issue – adding more web servers does not help because it is the databasethat ends up being a problem.Dynamo – A Distributed Storage SystemUnlike a relational database, Dynamo is a distributed storage system. Like a relational database it is stores informationto be retrieved, but it does not break the data into tables. Instead all objects are stored and looked up via a key.A simple way to think about such a system is in terms of URLs. When you navigate to the page on Amazon for the lastHarry Potter book, http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0545010225 you see a page that includes adescription of the book, customer reviews, related books, and so on. To create this page, Amazon’s infrastructurehas to perform many database lookups, the most basic of which is to grab information about the book from its URL(or, more likely, from its ASIN – a unique code for each Amazon product, 0545010225 in this case). A few weeks ago, Werner Vogels, the CTO of Amazon, published a long technical paper on his blog aboutAmazon’s highly available storage system called Dynamo. The paper itself is quite complex and technical and includes a description of the architecture,algorithms and tests that Amazon has been doing with the system. Top Reasons to Go With Managed WordPress Hosting Tags:#Analysis#web However, it is difficult to create redundancy and parallelism with relational databases, sothey become a single point of failure. In particular, replication is not trivial. To understand why, considerthe problem of having two database servers that need to have identical data. Having both servers for reading and writingdata makes it difficult to synchronize changes. Having one master server and another slave is bad too, because the master has totake all the heat when users are writing information.